Sharons-CourtRecords: Forensic Records-Accuracy?

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Forensic Records-Accuracy?

Minnesota Trial Court Public Access (MPA) Remote View
Logout
Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help
Case Records

Criminal Case Records
Civil, Family & Probate Case Records
Judgments Search
Court Calendar
To begin your case query, select 'All MNCIS Sites - Case Search' or an individual county from the drop-down box above. NOTICE: Name searches for criminal case records WILL NOT return 'preconviction criminal records.' A 'preconviction criminal record' is a record for which there is no conviction as defined by Minn. Stat. 609.02, subd. 5 (2004). NOTICE: A statewide case inquiry may exclude district courts that have not yet converted to MNCIS. Click on the MNCIS link (below) for more information. NOTICE: Please read Policies, Notices, & Instructions (in the link below) before conducting a case inquiry.

MN Judicial BranchMNCISPolicies, Notices, & InstructionsFAQ

of the Minnesota Judicial Branch

This site provides information on how to access case records available for public viewing as defined under the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch.

Minnesota Online District (Trial) Case Records: Minnesota District Courts offer an online case inquiry tool for statewide electronic case records, called MPA Remote, which stands for Minnesota Trial Court Public Access Remote view. MPA Remote is a public-view version of the Minnesota Court Information System (MNCIS), the computerized case management system used by Minnesota District Courts to track and manage cases. MPA Remote contains replicated public case data from MNCIS. Upon inquiry, MPA Remote displays case information for public viewing, including register of actions, calendars, judgments, and orders and notices prepared by the court. Internet Explorer is required to use this service. Please read our Policies, Notices, & Instructions and Frequently Asked Questions, located at right.

Online case inquiries are restricted by the remote access provisions of the Rules of Public Access (see Rule 8, subd. 2). For example, street addresses and name searches for pre-conviction criminal cases are not available online, but are available at courthouse public access terminals, as described below under the heading "At the Courthouse." Electronic copies of documents filed by parties in district court also are not accessible online. The federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) also prevents us from displaying harassment and domestic abuse case records online, but these are available at the courthouse. Comment fields for all case types are not available online but are available at the courthouse.

To access this service, please click here to read and acknowledge the terms and conditions below.

Minnesota Online Appellate Court Opinions & Case Records: The Minnesota Supreme Court and Court of Appeals offer online access to court opinions and case records through the public view of the Minnesota Appellate Courts Case Management System (P–MACS).
At the Courthouse: Each Minnesota District Courthouse offers electronic access to statewide public case records through public access terminals. Each district courthouse also offers in-person counter access to locally-stored, public case records in paper form.

Courthouse public access terminals provide the most complete access to electronic district court case records, because they are not restricted by the remote access provisions of the Rules of Public Access (see Rule 8, subd. 2). For example, street addresses and name searches for pre-conviction criminal case records are available at courthouse public access terminals, but not through the online case inquiry, as described above.

Required Acknowledgement for MPA Remote:

Please read and acknowledge these terms before using MPA Remote to access district court records:

UNOFFICIAL RECORDS. The information available on MPA Remote is provided as a service and is not considered an official court record. The Minnesota Judicial Branch does not certify MPA Remote records or search results and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the data found on MPA Remote. Certified civil judgment search results may be obtained from court administration.
LIMITED CASE RECORD INFORMATION. Case records are only displayed for Minnesota District (Trial) Courts that have converted to the new MNCIS statewide case management system (click here to see all "green" counties that have converted). The information available on MPA Remote is limited to district court case records that are publicly and remotely accessible under the Minnesota Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch. Under these rules, not all publicly-accessible case records are remotely accessible. This means that certain publicly-accessible case records cannot be viewed online via the Internet. For example, party address and name searches on criminal pre-conviction case records are publicly accessible and available at the courthouse, but not online. You WILL NOT be notified when such public data is restricted from online viewing. Electronic copies of public documents filed by parties also cannot be viewed online at this time. Please read Rule 8, subd. 2, for more information. The federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) also prevents us from displaying harassment and domestic abuse case records online, but these are available at the courthouse. Comment fields for all case types are not available online but are available at the courthouse.
MPA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS. Background checks should be conducted through the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension’s (BCA) Computerized Criminal History (CCH) system, which you can access online at https://cch.state.mn.us/, at their office located at 1430 Maryland Avenue East in St. Paul, or by calling 651-793-2400 for information. The BCA’s CCH system links prior criminal history through fingerprints to verify the identification of the individual. MPA Remote cannot provide this level of verification.
Background checks should be conducted through the BCA Computerized Criminal History (CCH) system, which you can access at 1430 Maryland Avenue East in St. Paul or call 651-793-2400 for information. The BCA's CCH system links prior criminal history through fingerprints to verify the identification of the individual. MPA cannot provide this level of verification.
CAUTION: NAME SEARCHES CAN BE UNRELIABLE. Use caution in evaluating MPA data, as the person for whom you have searched could have the same name, birth date, or other identifiers as another individual. Even if you believe your search has returned the correct match and the information appears to be about the person for whom you have searched, remember that:

o two or more people can have the same name and birth date; and

o criminal offenders frequently use aliases, including the names of others.

YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE for understanding the meaning of the case record information that you view through MPA Remote and for the appropriate and lawful use of such information. If you have any questions regarding the meaning of case information on MPA Remote, please ask the local court administrator. You are also responsible for determining whether any case record information previously obtained from MPA Remote is still accurate, current, and complete.
If you see any ERRORS on MPA Remote, please notify the court clerk of the corresponding district court.
PLEASE READ OUR POLICIES, NOTICES, & INSTRUCTIONS for more information before using MPA Remote. This document is available through the link at the top of this page and at the top of each screen of the MPA Remote inquiry tool.

Please acknowledge that you have read and accept the above terms and limitations, and that you agree to use the MPA Remote website subject to such terms.

I ACCEPT I DECLINE

http://pa.courts.s

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search

Search Criteria: Anderson, Sharon

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search

Help

Case Number	Style	Filed/Location	Type/Status
01-C3-00-000694	KEITH CRANDALL vs. SHARON ANDERSON	10/25/2000 Aitkin	Civil Other/Misc. Converted Closed
01-C6-04-000634	DONALD LIND vs SHARON ANDERSON	09/24/2004 Aitkin	Civil Other/Misc. Converted Closed

tate.mn.us/CaseSearchResults.aspx?SearchLinkIndex=2

31-CX-96-000

31-SX-95-000627

RANGE CREDIT BUREAU, INC. vs. JAMES RICHARD ANDERSON et al.

11/03/1995
Itasca

Conciliation
Converted Closed

248

RANGE CREDIT BUREAU, INC. vs. JAMES RICHARD ANDERSON et al.

02/12/1996
Itasca

Transcript Judgment
Converted Closed

62-C0-95-005487

ETHICAL PRACTICES BOARD -VS- SHARON ANDERSON & THE ANDERSON VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE

05/30/1995
Ramsey Civil

Contract
Converted Closed

ETHICAL PRACTICES BOARD -VS- SHARON ANDERSON & THE ANDERSON VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE

05/30/1995
Ramsey Civil

Contract
Converted Closed

62-C6-82-458786

CHRISTOPHER M. STROMME et al. vs. BERNICE A. PETERSON et al.

09/07/1982
Ramsey Civil

Civil Other/Misc.

62-CX-89-006914	SHARON ANDERSON et al. vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.	06/22/1989 Ramsey Civil	Civil Other/Misc. Converted Closed
62-CX-93-002768	CHRISTOPHER A. JACOBSON -VS- SHARON SCARELLA A/K/A SHARON SCARELLA ANDERSON, etal	03/17/1993 Ramsey Civil	Civil Other/Misc. Converted Closed

62-F9-96-001366

JAMES RICHARD ANDERSON J&D 042197 JOHNSON J(GEJ) 1017 199-208 vs. SHARON LEE ANDERSON (BLK TO GEJ)

05/29/1996
Ramsey Family Main

Dissolution without Child
Converted Closed

69-C2-95-601956

ETHICAL PRACTICES BOARD -VS- SHARON ANDERSON AND THE ANDERSON VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE

10/26/1995
- St. Louis-Duluth

Transcript Judgment From Other Minnesota County
Converted Closed

No comments:

SharonsFacebook

From: sharon4anderson@aol.com To: kfeatherly@minnlawyer.com, dschultz@gw.hamline.edu, mvolpe998@gmail.com, sharon4anderson@aol.com, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, tvezner@pioneerpress.com, fmelo@pioneerpress.com, bshaw@pioneerpress.com, bill4dahn@aol.com, editor@pioneerpress.com, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections@co.ramsey.mn.us, asksheriff@co.ramsey.mn.us Sent: 8/9/2018 5:22:01 PM Central Standard Time Subject: Minnesota LawyerSharonAnderson aka Scarrella4MNAGPioneerpress nothing Wed.9Aug2018 https://www.twincities.com/2018/08/09/lessard-a-possible-snag-for-wardlow-in-republican-ag-race/ re Bill Salisbury www.pioneerpress.com 651-228-5538 Curious why BSxxx wilfully failed to mention Candidate Sharon Anderson? However as soon as Kevin Featherly 651-222-1837 or his editor JeffS 612-588-1575correction please use. https://minnlawyer.com/2018/08/09/quirky-candidate-andersons-running-for-ag-again/ DISCLAIMER AFFIANT HAS SO MANY BRIEFS, PDF Files EVEN SHARON CAN'T FIND. Hopefully Corrections Sharon lives in St. Paul,MN Updated Research re Sandra Grazzini Rucki and Dede Eavold and Michelle MacDonald is by and thro Chicago Investigate Reporter Michael Volpe http://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/ To the Above Named: Hey Feathers You do not need a Libel Lawyer or any Lawyer, altho please make a few corrections listed below are you publishing Affiants Obituary or Legacy Affiant the BlogginBabe also http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com to Educate the Public on sharia Law, Election Reform ,Abolish Committment Panel,expose Judicial Corruption as Sharon intends to Vote in pdf format tomorrow. Sharons Modis Operxxx is to Challenge Canvass Boards. From: sharon4anderson@aol.com To: kfeatherly@minnlawyer.com, kfeatherly@yahoo.com, sharon4anderson@aol.com, dschultz@gw.hamline.edu Sent: 8/9/2018 8:57:08 AM Central Standard Time Subject: Check out Minnesota LawyerSharonAnderson aka Scarrella4MNAG Thurs9Aug2018 Hey Kevin When you say Quirky Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson says QuiTam,Quiet Title, Article is OK, perhaps Sharon did not have the Metro Fare to meet with you, Currently going to Elder Cafe, NO LIBEL Yet, by Errors and Omission the Name of Scarrella should have been addressed. The Submit Button does not work on the Article http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com https://search.aol.com/aol/search?s_it=sb-top&v_t=wscreen50-bb&q=Rev+Sharon+Scarrella+vs+Midwest+Federal+Savings+and+Loan Minnesota Lawyer Quirky candidate Anderson’s running for AG—again By: Kevin Featherly August 9, 2018 0 Anyone spending an hour interviewing Minnesota attorney general candidate Sharon Anderson is likely to wish a libel lawyer were present. We can’t repeat the various allegations, old and new, that the Republican hopeful lodged in an hour-long Aug. 2 interview. Which is to say, we can’t relate a lot of what she has to say. But here’s one relatively benign sample: “I’ve been thrown in jail, tmhrown in nut wards,” Anderson said. “They’re trying to bug me in this house. I’ve been reduced to poverty. They tried to hack my computer with my Windows 10.”INSTEAD OF BUG use the term Harrasment use of Illegal Excessive Consumption . https://taxthemax.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2018-06-04T11:35:00-0 https://taxthemax.blogspot.com/2018/03/697surreypropertytaxpaidunderprotes To harrass, bully, Stalking Sharon by DSI Ed Smith please also investigate Forensic Files https://www.facebook.com/groups/SharonsFiles/photos/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/SharonsFiles/files/ Alone among nine candidates in this profile series, Anderson declined to meet or be photographed. As a partial explanation for that, she said that she recently heard radio host Rush Limbaugh say on air that White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders now needs a security detail. Anderson, obviously, has no such luxury. Sharons SS in the bank on the 3rd, Sharon did not have Bus fare to meet Mr Feathers. Citizenery of MN must keep their Dignity, even tho Disabled, older etc. “Now, I’m not big and important like that,” she said. “But I do rock a lot of boats with a lot of people.” City St. Paul is Titanic Boat sinking I'M not, A lot of people rock boats with her, too.Google Michael Volpe Over decades, Anderson has filed voluminous lawsuits against judges, law enforcement, prosecutors, elected officials and banks. She remains perpetually miffed with the authorities who evicted her from her St. Paul Summit Avenue residence in 1988 for failing to pay property taxes. (She says she can prove she paid up and that the property remains hers.) http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file8.pdf Forensic Files http://sharon4anderson.org and http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncase Though she began running for office at least a decade before that, her eviction is at the root of a perpetual quest to attack public malfeasance, using the ballot box. “How am I, with no money, going to expose government corruption?” she said. “Only by being a candidate.” She already looks ahead to her next race for St. Paul City Council, she said. Anderson remains vexed, too, by her 1996 arrest in Itasca County on terroristic threat and harassment charges, which led to 94 days in a psychiatric ward. Eventually a judge released her after finding her in partial remission from her illness. Released as Sharons 2nd husband never filed charges and he was Murdered, Released as NO CASE. http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com One positive came from that experience—a campaign slogan. “I am the only certified sane candidate,” Anderson says happily. She has had made the most of her motto.https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/1974/45250-1.html Learned in Law has never been defined by Legislature https://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases- mslature to mean License. Anderson has run for everything from state House to Minnesota Supreme Court justice, even U.S. president. Her electoral record roughly parallels her trial record; she rarely comes close to winning. She has, however, cracked 30 percent at the polls nine times, most recently in a 2016 state Senate race. And she can look back on one startling triumph. In 1994, Anderson beat Tom Neuville in the attorney general’s race primary. Neuville, then a state senator, retired in January from his job as a Rice County district court judge. Surprisingly, Anderson said she found that experience rather joyless. She can think of only one moment she really liked—being interviewed in radio talk show host Barbara Carlson’s famous hot tub. “That was fun!” she said. Exposing corruption Anderson can be disarmingly warm when talking of her hosta plants or the kitty mewing in the background. But she can shock, too. The figures who populate her Centaurus-like constellation of grievances, for example, often get indecorous appellations attached to their names—“the Muslim,” “the lesbian,” “the black man.”ALL LIVES MATTER Sometimes she moves from one mood extreme to the other in a single ping-pong paragraph of dialogue. “I know I am hard to follow,” she said. “But I have 40 years of evidence on all this stuff.” Her life’s purpose is to lay all that evidence out to the public, revealing government abuses that she says have been visited on her and other people—like convicted parental-rights violator Sandra Grazzini-Rucki—whose causes she champions. You can look those manifold allegations on her campaign web site, blog postings and long litigation trail. We’ll refrain—that libel attorney is still not handy. Attorneys favorable tom Fitton www.judicialwatch.org https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/hud-sued-for-recor Eric Kaardal, Michelle MacDonald et al. While she acknowledges winning is not her aim, Anderson claims she is “more serious” than usual about this race. For that, she cites twin causes: Donald Trump and Keith Ellison. “I am loyal to Donald Trump,” Anderson swoons. “I love that man. I love his family.” She calls the president her “mentor,” though one wonders if the reverse couldn’t be true. Her innovative 1994 campaign promise to throw Skip Humphrey in prison for treason predates the Trumpian “Lock her up!” chant by two full decades. Her feelings toward Ellison are noticeably less rhapsodic. Because of his religion, she said, Ellison is unqualified to be attorney general. If he should win, she fears being recast as a “second-class citizen.” Even Licensed Lawyers make us 2nd class citizens. “Ellison is a Muslim,” she says dispositively. “How can a Muslim take an oath to support and defend the United States Constitution? He can’t. He owes his allegiance to the Quran and to sharia law.” She cannot be convinced that Islam’s followers constitute no unified, purpose-driven bloc in opposition to her politics. “There is only one kind of Muslim that I know of,” Anderson said. We feel morally obliged to point out that she is wrong. To state the obvious, Sunnis, Shiites and Sufis are three major Islamic variants of Islam and they have major doctrinal differences. Ellison reportedly identifies as Sunni. Likewise, it’s untrue that Muslims uniformly agree on sharia. According to a 39-country Pew Research Center poll in 2013, adherents tend to view sharia as “the revealed word of God” rather than “a body of law.” Even where “sharia law” is thought desirable, there are few countries where a majority believes that law should apply to Muslim and non-Muslim alike. Not that railing against his religion is her only strategy for derailing the Ellison campaign train. She said she recently petitioned the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board to get Ellison’s law license revoked. Doing so ignores an irony—Anderson is herself no attorney. In fact, she harbors deep animus toward pretty much all lawyers and declares she doesn’t need to be one to serve as AG. (She’s right that it’s not required.) The lawyers’ board did not share its reply to Anderson’s complaint. But Anderson read part of it aloud over the phone.Posted at http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com It said she accuses Ellison of using his congressional office and attorney general candidacy “to attack President Trump and incite violence.” She also charged that Ellison’s conduct “constitutes treason” and “violates the separation of powers doctrine.” Anderson said the board won’t investigate her complaint. Its website shows that Ellison is current on his Minnesota registration fees as of January 2018. It also indicates that he voluntarily requested his Minnesota license be inactivated because he hasn’t kept up on local CLE credits. If he did that, he’d be immediately reinstated, a board spokeswoman said. AG ambitions Not all of Anderson’s goals involve Ellison. In fact, should she somehow manage once again to Neuville the competition, she has other big plans. Atop her list, Anderson wants somehow to revive Magner v. Gallagher, a St. Paul fair housing case that the U.S. Supreme Court accepted in 2011, but never heard because the parties agreed to a dismissal .http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/ Facts current AG Lori Swanson wilful neglience to Write a Brief is Pervase/Fatal http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf Feathers stated he would not read Executive Summary In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City. Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, had spent almost a decade working to improve economic opportunities for low-income residents in his community. In 2009, Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. By November 2011, Newell had spent over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the Justice Department’s Civil Division. These three entities, which had each invested a substantial amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth as much as $200 million for taxpayers and recommended that the federal government join the suit. These career attorneys even went so far as to prepare a formal memorandum recommending intervention, calling St. Paul’s actions a “particularly egregious example of false certifications.” All this work was for naught. In late November 2011, Lillehaug made Perez aware of Newell’s pending case against the City and the possibility that the Justice Department may intervene. A trade was proposed: non-intervention in Newell’s case for the withdrawal of Magner. Perez contacted HUD General Counsel Helen Kanovsky and asked her to reconsider HUD’s support for intervention in Newell’s case. Perez also spoke to then-Civil Division Assistant Attorney General Tony West and B. Todd Jones, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, alerting them to his new interest in Newell’s case. The withdrawal of HUD’s support for Newell’s case led to an erosion of support in the Civil Division, a process that was actively managed by Perez. In January 2012, Perez began leading negotiations with Lillehaug, offering him a “roadmap” to a global settlement. Once negotiations appeared to break down, Perez boarded a plane and flew to Minnesota to meet face-to-face with Mayor Coleman. At that early February meeting, Perez pleaded for the fate of disparate impact and reiterated the Justice Department’s willingness to strike a deal. His lobbying paid off when Lillehaug accepted the deal on Mayor Anderson blames that outcome on the machinations of former assistant U.S. attorney general for civil rights, Tom Perez. Perez is now chair of the Democratic National Committee—where Ellison is deputy chair. So he is implicated, too. “I call them the Obama boys,” she said. Anderson also wants to eliminate all of Minnesota’s 87 county attorneys and its city attorneys. In their place, 10 statewide district attorneys would be appointed under her command. Why do that? “Because we are over-lawed and over-lawyered,” she said. “I believe that we do not need all these lawyers.” Further, she would forcefully utilize parens patrie (“parent of the fatherland”). The legal precept allows state attorneys general to, for example, sue private companies on behalf of citizens for monetary damages, in a manner similar to class actions. So, again, why? “Because we SCOTUSblog Coverage Fair housing case dismissed (Lyle Denniston) Petition of the day (Conor McEvily) Briefs and Documents Merits Briefs for the Petitioners Brief for Steve Magner et al. Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al. Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al. Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al. Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. Brief of the American Bankers Association et al. Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party Brief of the United States Merits Briefs for the Respondents Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al. Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al. Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al. Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al. Brief of the ACLU Brief of Massachusetts et al. Brief of Henry G. Cisneros Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action Certiorari-stage documents Opinion below (8th Cir.) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al. Petitioners' reply wouldn’t have all these family court squabbles, let’s put it that way,” she said. Anderson additionally wants to impeach some judges and accomplish various other things besides. She knows she is never going to make any of it happen. But it doesn’t matter because, to Anderson, more than personal ambition is at stake. “I’m not going to win the election,” Anderson said. “But let’s hope to God that we win the war for Donald Trump.” Name: Sharon Anderson Age: Not available Lives in: Not available St. PAUL,MN Education: “School of hard knocks.” Family: Widowed. One daughter, seven grandchildren. Hobbies: Politics. Surprising fact: “The only addiction that I have is this computer. My computer is my main man.” Current Candidate MNAG LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogsbd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4andersonHomestead Act of 1862| ScriDocument's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org www.scotusblog.com whistbleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com