Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696

Sunday, September 21, 2014

In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker

Darlene Winter Member Senior Group, meets every Tues. Affiant verily alleges that her Sal Sister Darlene Winter mayhave been exploited as a Vunerable Adult via her Daughter Barbara Winter in a Committment.
Darlene Winter Ramsey County Homeowner at 1113 St. Paul Ave St. Paul,MN TEL 651-698-1657 DSI 1113 St Paul Ave

St Paul, MN 55116 ‎

Directions

Search nearby

Maps Labs - Help INspector Ed Smith Condemnation

By information and Belief, talking to Darlene at St. Mary's Mayo Clinic 507-255-5529 Sat.20Sept2014, Darlene stated her Daughter Barbara has POA hereinafter Power of Attorney and that Mon Darlene was to be Transferred to Inver Grove in Dakota County.

Affiant Next Friend and others are duly concerned that Darlene may be a Vunerable Adult, exploited for Greed, This Published Blog is inquiry for the Concern of possible Heinous Violations of Ramsey Co. Probate Court via Joel Olson Referee Manager Social Worker Elmer Mack
http://www.leagletax.com/decision/19972346954FSupp1392_12178/SPEED%20v.%20RAMSEY%20COUNTY Ramsey Co Defendants Wrongful Death
1997 Elmer Mack has been around a long time.

Skip to Main Content Logout My Account Search Menu New Civil Search Refine Search Back

Location : - Ramsey Probate Mental Health

Help

Case No. 62-PR-14-696

Guardianship/Conservatorship of Darlene J. Winter

§
§
§
§
§

Case Type:	Guardianship/Conservatorship
Subtype:	Emergency Guardianship / Conservatorship (GCV)
Date Filed:	09/11/2014
Location:	- Ramsey Probate Mental Health

Party Information
			Lead Attorneys
Petitioner	Winter, Barbara		BRUCE L BECK Retained 651-770-2400(W)
Petitioner	St. Paul, MN 55119		BRUCE L BECK Retained 651-770-2400(W)

Respondent	Winter, Darlene J	DOB: 12/22/1941	RUTH ANN GAYDOS Court Appointed 651-442-6865(W)
Respondent	St. Paul, MN 55116	DOB: 12/22/1941	RUTH ANN GAYDOS Court Appointed 651-442-6865(W)

Events & Orders of the Court

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS

09/11/2014

Petition for Emergency Guardianship/Conservatorship Doc ID# 1

09/11/2014

Petition for Guardianship/Conservatorship Doc ID# 4

09/12/2014

Other Document Doc ID# 6

09/12/2014

Order for Hearing and Notice of Rights Doc ID# 7

09/12/2014

Notice

Winter, Darlene J

Unserved

09/12/2014

Order for Hearing and Notice of Rights Doc ID# 8

09/12/2014

Notice

Winter, Darlene J

Unserved

09/15/2014

Affidavit of Service Doc ID# 9

09/15/2014

Affidavit of Service Doc ID# 10

09/15/2014

Affidavit of Publication Doc ID# 11

09/16/2014

Probate Hearing (2:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Olson,Joel ,)

Result: Held

09/17/2014

Order Granting Emergency Guardianship Doc ID# 14 (Judicial Officer: Olson,Joel , )

09/17/2014

Letters of Emergency Guardianship Doc ID# 15 (Judicial Officer: Olson,Joel , )

10/07/2014

Probate Hearing (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Olson,Joel ,)

Financial Information



	Petitioner Winter, Barbara
	Total Financial Assessment			429.00
	Total Payments and Credits			429.00
	Balance Due as of 09/21/2014			0.00

09/11/2014	Transaction Assessment			429.00
09/11/2014	E-File Electronic Payment	Receipt # EF62P-2014-00621 Meghan Kelley Mohs, MA, MSW Director, Ramsey County Community Human Services Department 160 E. Kellogg Blvd., Suite 9800 St. Paul, MN 55101 651.266.4417 Direct 651.266.4439 FAX meghan.mohs@co.ramsey.mn.us Administrative Assistant: Sue Sutter 651.266.4416 susan.sutter@co.ramsey.mn.us The boy they couldn't save \| Star Tribune www.startribune.com/local/273325741.html Star Tribune Sep 2, 2014 - His death exposes the failure of a system charged with protecting the youngest ... Fifty-four Minnesota children have died of maltreatment since 2005, ... Pope County's review of the case, completed last month, concluded that ...	Winter, Barbara	(429.00)

Subj: Re: This Week on #OffTheGrid with Jesse Ventura

CDCS environmental modifications and provisions: Services and supports to help people maintain their environment so they can live and participate in the community.

Covered Services

Examples of covered services, supports and/or items include the following:

• Adaptive clothing
• Assistive technology
• Costs associated with

a fitness or exercise program for adults when the service is necessary and appropriate to treat, maintain or improve a physical condition and monitored by a physician enrolled in a Minnesota Health Care Plan
• Environmental supports such as snow removal, lawn care, and heavy cleaning
• Home and vehicle modifications
• Home-delivered meals
• Special diets that a MHCP physician prescribes to relieve the person’s disability and are not available through the Medical Assistance State Plan
• Supplies and equipment
• Transportation

Exceptions

For assi

stive technology and home and vehicle modifications, the lead agency:

• Must make sure that the first $5,000 of costs for modifications or assistive technology come out of a person’s CDCS budget
• May authorize funds for assistive technology and modifications within the county’s overall waiver allocation after the first $5,000 has been spent

A person may choose to pay for more assistive technology or modifications from their CDCS budget.

http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=id_048200#

To: "Sharon4Anderson" <sharon4anderson@aol.com>,
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 11:57:56 PM

Subject: Darlene Winter, CADI waiver/grant home care and other alternatives to conservatorship and guardianship

http://www.dhs.state.mn

.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=i

d_000855

Community Alternati

ves for Disabled Individuals (CADI) Waiver: Home and community-based services necessary as an alternative to institutionalization that promote the optimal health, independence, safety and integration of a person who would otherwise require the level of care provided in a nursing facility.

CADI Waiver Eligibility

To be eligible for the CADI Waiver, a person must choose the CADI Waiver and meet all of the following criteria:

1. Eligible for Medical As

sistance (MA).
2. Certified disabled by Social Security or the State Medical Review Team (SMRT) process.
3. Under the age of 65 years at time of opening to the waiver.
4. Determined by the case manager/service coordinator to need nursing facility level of care.
5. Has an assessed need for supports and services over and above those available through the MA St

ate plan.

Nursing Facility Level of Care criteria

To meet the requirements for a Nursing Facility Level of Care DHS-3361 (PDF), a person must demonstratethe need for assistance because of one or more of the following:

• Need for restorative and rehabilitative or other special treatment
• Unstable health
• Need for complex care management
• Functional limitation
• Existence of complicating conditions
• Cognitive or behavioral condition

• Frailty or vulnerability

Chore Program: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=id_001907#

Consumer Directed Community Supports (CDCS): http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=id_048211

CDCS may include services, support and/or items currently available through the MA waivers, as well as additional allowable services that provide needed support to persons.

There are specific requirements for all services, supports and/or items that are available through the MA waivers, including CDCS. In order for services, supports and/or items to be purchased under CDCS, they must:

• Be for the sole benefit of the person
• Be the least costly alternative that reasonably meets the person’s identified needs
• Collectively provide a feasible alternative to an institution
• Meet the identified needs and outcomes in the person’s community support plan and assure the health, safety and welfare of the person

If all the above criteria are met, services, supports and/or items are appropriate purchases when they are reasonably necessary to meet the following outcomes:

• Decrease dependency on formal support services
• Develop or maintain personal, social, physical, or work related skills
• Enhance community inclusion and family involvement
• Increase independence of the person
• Increase the ability of unpaid family members and friends to receive training and education needed to provide support

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgcPlhwyBgE PLEASE HELP HANNAH4MNGOV

also at www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com Beautiful Women similar to your Wife need your Political Moxie Peace

No comments:

SharonsFacebook

From: sharon4anderson@aol.com To: kfeatherly@minnlawyer.com, dschultz@gw.hamline.edu, mvolpe998@gmail.com, sharon4anderson@aol.com, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, tvezner@pioneerpress.com, fmelo@pioneerpress.com, bshaw@pioneerpress.com, bill4dahn@aol.com, editor@pioneerpress.com, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections@co.ramsey.mn.us, asksheriff@co.ramsey.mn.us Sent: 8/9/2018 5:22:01 PM Central Standard Time Subject: Minnesota LawyerSharonAnderson aka Scarrella4MNAGPioneerpress nothing Wed.9Aug2018 https://www.twincities.com/2018/08/09/lessard-a-possible-snag-for-wardlow-in-republican-ag-race/ re Bill Salisbury www.pioneerpress.com 651-228-5538 Curious why BSxxx wilfully failed to mention Candidate Sharon Anderson? However as soon as Kevin Featherly 651-222-1837 or his editor JeffS 612-588-1575correction please use. https://minnlawyer.com/2018/08/09/quirky-candidate-andersons-running-for-ag-again/ DISCLAIMER AFFIANT HAS SO MANY BRIEFS, PDF Files EVEN SHARON CAN'T FIND. Hopefully Corrections Sharon lives in St. Paul,MN Updated Research re Sandra Grazzini Rucki and Dede Eavold and Michelle MacDonald is by and thro Chicago Investigate Reporter Michael Volpe http://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/ To the Above Named: Hey Feathers You do not need a Libel Lawyer or any Lawyer, altho please make a few corrections listed below are you publishing Affiants Obituary or Legacy Affiant the BlogginBabe also http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com to Educate the Public on sharia Law, Election Reform ,Abolish Committment Panel,expose Judicial Corruption as Sharon intends to Vote in pdf format tomorrow. Sharons Modis Operxxx is to Challenge Canvass Boards. From: sharon4anderson@aol.com To: kfeatherly@minnlawyer.com, kfeatherly@yahoo.com, sharon4anderson@aol.com, dschultz@gw.hamline.edu Sent: 8/9/2018 8:57:08 AM Central Standard Time Subject: Check out Minnesota LawyerSharonAnderson aka Scarrella4MNAG Thurs9Aug2018 Hey Kevin When you say Quirky Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson says QuiTam,Quiet Title, Article is OK, perhaps Sharon did not have the Metro Fare to meet with you, Currently going to Elder Cafe, NO LIBEL Yet, by Errors and Omission the Name of Scarrella should have been addressed. The Submit Button does not work on the Article http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com https://search.aol.com/aol/search?s_it=sb-top&v_t=wscreen50-bb&q=Rev+Sharon+Scarrella+vs+Midwest+Federal+Savings+and+Loan Minnesota Lawyer Quirky candidate Anderson’s running for AG—again By: Kevin Featherly August 9, 2018 0 Anyone spending an hour interviewing Minnesota attorney general candidate Sharon Anderson is likely to wish a libel lawyer were present. We can’t repeat the various allegations, old and new, that the Republican hopeful lodged in an hour-long Aug. 2 interview. Which is to say, we can’t relate a lot of what she has to say. But here’s one relatively benign sample: “I’ve been thrown in jail, tmhrown in nut wards,” Anderson said. “They’re trying to bug me in this house. I’ve been reduced to poverty. They tried to hack my computer with my Windows 10.”INSTEAD OF BUG use the term Harrasment use of Illegal Excessive Consumption . https://taxthemax.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2018-06-04T11:35:00-0 https://taxthemax.blogspot.com/2018/03/697surreypropertytaxpaidunderprotes To harrass, bully, Stalking Sharon by DSI Ed Smith please also investigate Forensic Files https://www.facebook.com/groups/SharonsFiles/photos/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/SharonsFiles/files/ Alone among nine candidates in this profile series, Anderson declined to meet or be photographed. As a partial explanation for that, she said that she recently heard radio host Rush Limbaugh say on air that White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders now needs a security detail. Anderson, obviously, has no such luxury. Sharons SS in the bank on the 3rd, Sharon did not have Bus fare to meet Mr Feathers. Citizenery of MN must keep their Dignity, even tho Disabled, older etc. “Now, I’m not big and important like that,” she said. “But I do rock a lot of boats with a lot of people.” City St. Paul is Titanic Boat sinking I'M not, A lot of people rock boats with her, too.Google Michael Volpe Over decades, Anderson has filed voluminous lawsuits against judges, law enforcement, prosecutors, elected officials and banks. She remains perpetually miffed with the authorities who evicted her from her St. Paul Summit Avenue residence in 1988 for failing to pay property taxes. (She says she can prove she paid up and that the property remains hers.) http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file8.pdf Forensic Files http://sharon4anderson.org and http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncase Though she began running for office at least a decade before that, her eviction is at the root of a perpetual quest to attack public malfeasance, using the ballot box. “How am I, with no money, going to expose government corruption?” she said. “Only by being a candidate.” She already looks ahead to her next race for St. Paul City Council, she said. Anderson remains vexed, too, by her 1996 arrest in Itasca County on terroristic threat and harassment charges, which led to 94 days in a psychiatric ward. Eventually a judge released her after finding her in partial remission from her illness. Released as Sharons 2nd husband never filed charges and he was Murdered, Released as NO CASE. http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com One positive came from that experience—a campaign slogan. “I am the only certified sane candidate,” Anderson says happily. She has had made the most of her motto.https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/1974/45250-1.html Learned in Law has never been defined by Legislature https://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases- mslature to mean License. Anderson has run for everything from state House to Minnesota Supreme Court justice, even U.S. president. Her electoral record roughly parallels her trial record; she rarely comes close to winning. She has, however, cracked 30 percent at the polls nine times, most recently in a 2016 state Senate race. And she can look back on one startling triumph. In 1994, Anderson beat Tom Neuville in the attorney general’s race primary. Neuville, then a state senator, retired in January from his job as a Rice County district court judge. Surprisingly, Anderson said she found that experience rather joyless. She can think of only one moment she really liked—being interviewed in radio talk show host Barbara Carlson’s famous hot tub. “That was fun!” she said. Exposing corruption Anderson can be disarmingly warm when talking of her hosta plants or the kitty mewing in the background. But she can shock, too. The figures who populate her Centaurus-like constellation of grievances, for example, often get indecorous appellations attached to their names—“the Muslim,” “the lesbian,” “the black man.”ALL LIVES MATTER Sometimes she moves from one mood extreme to the other in a single ping-pong paragraph of dialogue. “I know I am hard to follow,” she said. “But I have 40 years of evidence on all this stuff.” Her life’s purpose is to lay all that evidence out to the public, revealing government abuses that she says have been visited on her and other people—like convicted parental-rights violator Sandra Grazzini-Rucki—whose causes she champions. You can look those manifold allegations on her campaign web site, blog postings and long litigation trail. We’ll refrain—that libel attorney is still not handy. Attorneys favorable tom Fitton www.judicialwatch.org https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/hud-sued-for-recor Eric Kaardal, Michelle MacDonald et al. While she acknowledges winning is not her aim, Anderson claims she is “more serious” than usual about this race. For that, she cites twin causes: Donald Trump and Keith Ellison. “I am loyal to Donald Trump,” Anderson swoons. “I love that man. I love his family.” She calls the president her “mentor,” though one wonders if the reverse couldn’t be true. Her innovative 1994 campaign promise to throw Skip Humphrey in prison for treason predates the Trumpian “Lock her up!” chant by two full decades. Her feelings toward Ellison are noticeably less rhapsodic. Because of his religion, she said, Ellison is unqualified to be attorney general. If he should win, she fears being recast as a “second-class citizen.” Even Licensed Lawyers make us 2nd class citizens. “Ellison is a Muslim,” she says dispositively. “How can a Muslim take an oath to support and defend the United States Constitution? He can’t. He owes his allegiance to the Quran and to sharia law.” She cannot be convinced that Islam’s followers constitute no unified, purpose-driven bloc in opposition to her politics. “There is only one kind of Muslim that I know of,” Anderson said. We feel morally obliged to point out that she is wrong. To state the obvious, Sunnis, Shiites and Sufis are three major Islamic variants of Islam and they have major doctrinal differences. Ellison reportedly identifies as Sunni. Likewise, it’s untrue that Muslims uniformly agree on sharia. According to a 39-country Pew Research Center poll in 2013, adherents tend to view sharia as “the revealed word of God” rather than “a body of law.” Even where “sharia law” is thought desirable, there are few countries where a majority believes that law should apply to Muslim and non-Muslim alike. Not that railing against his religion is her only strategy for derailing the Ellison campaign train. She said she recently petitioned the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board to get Ellison’s law license revoked. Doing so ignores an irony—Anderson is herself no attorney. In fact, she harbors deep animus toward pretty much all lawyers and declares she doesn’t need to be one to serve as AG. (She’s right that it’s not required.) The lawyers’ board did not share its reply to Anderson’s complaint. But Anderson read part of it aloud over the phone.Posted at http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com It said she accuses Ellison of using his congressional office and attorney general candidacy “to attack President Trump and incite violence.” She also charged that Ellison’s conduct “constitutes treason” and “violates the separation of powers doctrine.” Anderson said the board won’t investigate her complaint. Its website shows that Ellison is current on his Minnesota registration fees as of January 2018. It also indicates that he voluntarily requested his Minnesota license be inactivated because he hasn’t kept up on local CLE credits. If he did that, he’d be immediately reinstated, a board spokeswoman said. AG ambitions Not all of Anderson’s goals involve Ellison. In fact, should she somehow manage once again to Neuville the competition, she has other big plans. Atop her list, Anderson wants somehow to revive Magner v. Gallagher, a St. Paul fair housing case that the U.S. Supreme Court accepted in 2011, but never heard because the parties agreed to a dismissal .http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/ Facts current AG Lori Swanson wilful neglience to Write a Brief is Pervase/Fatal http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf Feathers stated he would not read Executive Summary In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s lawsuit against the City. Fredrick Newell, a minister and small-business owner in St. Paul, had spent almost a decade working to improve economic opportunities for low-income residents in his community. In 2009, Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. By November 2011, Newell had spent over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the Justice Department’s Civil Division. These three entities, which had each invested a substantial amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth as much as $200 million for taxpayers and recommended that the federal government join the suit. These career attorneys even went so far as to prepare a formal memorandum recommending intervention, calling St. Paul’s actions a “particularly egregious example of false certifications.” All this work was for naught. In late November 2011, Lillehaug made Perez aware of Newell’s pending case against the City and the possibility that the Justice Department may intervene. A trade was proposed: non-intervention in Newell’s case for the withdrawal of Magner. Perez contacted HUD General Counsel Helen Kanovsky and asked her to reconsider HUD’s support for intervention in Newell’s case. Perez also spoke to then-Civil Division Assistant Attorney General Tony West and B. Todd Jones, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, alerting them to his new interest in Newell’s case. The withdrawal of HUD’s support for Newell’s case led to an erosion of support in the Civil Division, a process that was actively managed by Perez. In January 2012, Perez began leading negotiations with Lillehaug, offering him a “roadmap” to a global settlement. Once negotiations appeared to break down, Perez boarded a plane and flew to Minnesota to meet face-to-face with Mayor Coleman. At that early February meeting, Perez pleaded for the fate of disparate impact and reiterated the Justice Department’s willingness to strike a deal. His lobbying paid off when Lillehaug accepted the deal on Mayor Anderson blames that outcome on the machinations of former assistant U.S. attorney general for civil rights, Tom Perez. Perez is now chair of the Democratic National Committee—where Ellison is deputy chair. So he is implicated, too. “I call them the Obama boys,” she said. Anderson also wants to eliminate all of Minnesota’s 87 county attorneys and its city attorneys. In their place, 10 statewide district attorneys would be appointed under her command. Why do that? “Because we are over-lawed and over-lawyered,” she said. “I believe that we do not need all these lawyers.” Further, she would forcefully utilize parens patrie (“parent of the fatherland”). The legal precept allows state attorneys general to, for example, sue private companies on behalf of citizens for monetary damages, in a manner similar to class actions. So, again, why? “Because we SCOTUSblog Coverage Fair housing case dismissed (Lyle Denniston) Petition of the day (Conor McEvily) Briefs and Documents Merits Briefs for the Petitioners Brief for Steve Magner et al. Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al. Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al. Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al. Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. Brief of the American Bankers Association et al. Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party Brief of the United States Merits Briefs for the Respondents Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al. Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al. Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al. Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al. Brief of the ACLU Brief of Massachusetts et al. Brief of Henry G. Cisneros Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action Certiorari-stage documents Opinion below (8th Cir.) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al. Petitioners' reply wouldn’t have all these family court squabbles, let’s put it that way,” she said. Anderson additionally wants to impeach some judges and accomplish various other things besides. She knows she is never going to make any of it happen. But it doesn’t matter because, to Anderson, more than personal ambition is at stake. “I’m not going to win the election,” Anderson said. “But let’s hope to God that we win the war for Donald Trump.” Name: Sharon Anderson Age: Not available Lives in: Not available St. PAUL,MN Education: “School of hard knocks.” Family: Widowed. One daughter, seven grandchildren. Hobbies: Politics. Surprising fact: “The only addiction that I have is this computer. My computer is my main man.” Current Candidate MNAG LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogsbd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4andersonHomestead Act of 1862| ScriDocument's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org www.scotusblog.com whistbleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com

Sunday, September 21, 2014

In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker

The boy they couldn't save | Star Tribune

Covered Services

Exceptions

CADI Waiver Eligibility

Nursing Facility Level of Care criteria

No comments: